|
Post by wellhung on May 22, 2015 12:10:22 GMT -7
The recent Training Beta Podcast with Alex Barrows suggests an ARC alternative targeting the aerobic capacity of fast twitch muscles, along the lines of 20 x(30s on/30s) off. Looking for any excuse not to ARC, I tried this the other day at my usual ARC angle of 13 degrees and after at 28 degrees, and although I have no clue if this will improve my climbing in the long term, here are a few notes about it: 1) The distance I can climb in 30s in shockingly small. 2) the difficulty of the moves I can do using this protocol match up pretty well with the hard parts of my goal routes 3) It was pretty easy to adjust the intensity so that I was just at the onset of "spiraling down an anaerobic hole" at the 30 s mark. At 13 degrees I even got to use some of my worst holds... in an endurance workout! 3) 30s of rest is so long! You get back on the wall feeling near 100 %. Never got more pumped than I would in a continuous 20 minute ARC set. I was continuously breathing pretty hard though on the 28 degree set though. 4) unlike ARCing, where I am doing pretty easy moves on fairly large holds (kinda boring), this workout was actually pretty fun, since I got to do a lot of hard (for route climbing) moves. 20 minutes flew by. Mosty posted just to share, but what do the cognoscenti think of this protocol as an addition to ARCing for developing the ability to climb harder while staying in the aerobic regime?
|
|
|
Post by MarkAnderson on May 22, 2015 13:54:30 GMT -7
This sounds similar to the "volume bouldering" concept we've been kicking around, but better quantified on the duration side of the volume equation (though perhaps less-quantified on the intensity end).
It's great that you're experimenting, that is the way to optimize your training.
|
|
seano
New Member
Posts: 22
|
Post by seano on May 22, 2015 14:52:17 GMT -7
Mark, can you explain the volume bouldering or point me to where you described it before? I've done this workout before and actually quite enjoyed it: www.climbstrong.com/articles/20130121But I didn't know where it would fit into the RCTM program.
|
|
|
Post by amalec on May 22, 2015 16:19:14 GMT -7
I really enjoyed that podcast, but though the term "targeting fast twitch" was a bit BS. What Alex Barrows was talking about, I think, was targeting alactic and lactic/glycolytic capacity and recovery. That could be fast twitch and slow twitch (there's a lot of fast twitch = power and slow twitch = endurance misconception, but multiple types of fibers are involved). Very different from the recovery and basic capacity work that the RCTM ARC work targets. This is a good intro to the different kinds of work capacity: www.strongfirst.com/work-capacity-part-i/BTW, regardless of what you think of her hangboard approach, this series is a nerd's dream: en-eva-lopez.blogspot.com/2015/03/aerobic-endurance-training-in-sport.html
|
|
|
Post by MarkAnderson on May 22, 2015 17:42:11 GMT -7
|
|