|
Post by rctmdotcom on Apr 30, 2014 18:53:16 GMT -7
Chris asked:
|
|
|
Post by MarkAnderson on Apr 30, 2014 18:59:12 GMT -7
Chris,
Glad you like the book! "Progressive Max Ladder" is simply a term we made up to describe attempting several sets of progressively more difficult "Max Ladders" over the course of a workout, or Phase.
For example, suppose your Baseline Max Ladder is 1-3-5 (or B1-L3-R5-B5 and B1-R3-L5-B5 to be overly descriptive). If you were doing "progressive max ladders" you would try to improve upon that baseline, by attempting 1-3.5-5.5, or 1-3.5.5. If you stuck those, you would then try 1-3.5-6, and so on.
|
|
|
Post by stanleybaker on Feb 22, 2018 9:37:23 GMT -7
Super old thread, but it was answering what I came here to find.
Hey Mark, I'm wondering on the increments you choose to add to.
1-3-5 1-3-6
What's next?
1-3-7, or 1-4-6?
What's after that?
|
|
|
Post by MarkAnderson on Feb 22, 2018 10:37:49 GMT -7
1-4-6 is a lot easier than 1-3-7. It's always going to be easier to do a bigger 1st move than a bigger 2nd move, even if the finish rung stays the same (so 1-4-6 is easier than 1-3-6), because you have two arms pulling from the optimal position.
|
|
|
Post by stanleybaker on Feb 22, 2018 12:26:33 GMT -7
So if I can reliably do 1-3-6, what's the next goal? 1-3-7? 1-4-7?
|
|
|
Post by MarkAnderson on Feb 22, 2018 13:26:36 GMT -7
I would think 1-4-7. But, have you considered just trying both of them? Surely that's easier and more reliable than performing an internet survey
|
|
|
Post by stanleybaker on Feb 22, 2018 14:04:16 GMT -7
If both are equally impossible it's hard to know which impossible one is the right one to aim at. And in reality I'm still on 1-3-6 (I got it with my right hand once!), I'm just curious on where to head afterwords.
|
|