Post by tahmad on Jul 3, 2018 8:40:29 GMT -7
Hi All,
Going through my strength phase once again and have been thinking about the rest intervals. In the RCTM, it notes that, for functional hypertrophy, you're generally aiming for 3-5 minutes of rest between sets. I tried to find the specific rationale for why 3 minutes for the advanced hangboard protocol, but didn't find one. So I'm curious - why 3 minutes as opposed to 4? or 5?
My assumption is that it has something to do with overall metabolic load*** - i.e. 3 minutes is long enough to recover substantially, but not enough to get back to 100%. In other words, the climber is carrying over fatigue from set to set (and grip to grip) throughout a 6 grip/3 set each hangboard workout (Or at least I am, I am definitely not 100% recovered by the end of a 3 minute rest). Point being, we desire this overall sustained/high metabolic load throughout the entire workout to get the best results in terms of hypertrophy.
The second question this leads me to is, is there a reason not to rest more between grips then? I.e. lets say you rest the standard 3 minutes between each set of a given grip. But then between grips, you rest for five or even more minutes to get complete recovery. The downside of this is a lower overall metabolic load, I'd guess, if you are resting to total recovery. But the upside is that you can probably put a higher load in terms of weight etc. on each individual grip. Might this be more specific to the hypertrophy of that grip, since the joint angles only get trained within that 15 degree range on either side anyway? And has anyone tried this? If so, what sort of results did you see?
*** Side note - what is the actual definition of metabolic load we are using here? I've always understood it as a specific sort of stress on your muscles, i.e. a consistent demand for anaerobic energy production, but I know this is a pretty simplistic/shaky definition. The definitions from a simple google search are somewhat technical, so just curious to hear yall's thoughts on this.
Thanks for reading a long-winded theoretical question!
Going through my strength phase once again and have been thinking about the rest intervals. In the RCTM, it notes that, for functional hypertrophy, you're generally aiming for 3-5 minutes of rest between sets. I tried to find the specific rationale for why 3 minutes for the advanced hangboard protocol, but didn't find one. So I'm curious - why 3 minutes as opposed to 4? or 5?
My assumption is that it has something to do with overall metabolic load*** - i.e. 3 minutes is long enough to recover substantially, but not enough to get back to 100%. In other words, the climber is carrying over fatigue from set to set (and grip to grip) throughout a 6 grip/3 set each hangboard workout (Or at least I am, I am definitely not 100% recovered by the end of a 3 minute rest). Point being, we desire this overall sustained/high metabolic load throughout the entire workout to get the best results in terms of hypertrophy.
The second question this leads me to is, is there a reason not to rest more between grips then? I.e. lets say you rest the standard 3 minutes between each set of a given grip. But then between grips, you rest for five or even more minutes to get complete recovery. The downside of this is a lower overall metabolic load, I'd guess, if you are resting to total recovery. But the upside is that you can probably put a higher load in terms of weight etc. on each individual grip. Might this be more specific to the hypertrophy of that grip, since the joint angles only get trained within that 15 degree range on either side anyway? And has anyone tried this? If so, what sort of results did you see?
*** Side note - what is the actual definition of metabolic load we are using here? I've always understood it as a specific sort of stress on your muscles, i.e. a consistent demand for anaerobic energy production, but I know this is a pretty simplistic/shaky definition. The definitions from a simple google search are somewhat technical, so just curious to hear yall's thoughts on this.
Thanks for reading a long-winded theoretical question!